Important Reasons the Court Denied Rivers Allocation to Siminalayi Fubara

Significant legal and governance concerns are at the heart of the Federal High Court’s recent decision to stop the Federal Government from giving Rivers State monthly allocations. The court determined that Governor Siminalayi Fubara had not complied with an earlier judgment requiring him to submit the 2024 Appropriation Bill to the genuine faction of the Rivers State House of Assembly, which was headed by Hon. Martins Amaewhule, according to Vanguard.CONTINUE FULL READING>>>>>

This faction had been recognized by the court as the valid assembly, invalidating any budget proposals submitted by a rival group.

Moreover, the plaintiffs argued that Fubara’s actions constituted unauthorized withdrawals from the state’s consolidated revenue funds, violating Section 120 of the 1999 Constitution.

The court emphasized that adherence to judicial decisions is essential for maintaining the rule of law and proper governance.

This ruling not only halts allocations but also underscores the accountability expected of state officials in financial matters.

By restricting access to federal funds, the court aims to compel compliance with legal rulings and reinforce the authority of the recognized assembly, thus ensuring that governance in Rivers State aligns with constitutional mandates.

Ultimately, this decision reflects a broader commitment to uphold judicial authority in the face of administrative challenges.CONTINUE FULL READING>>>>>