Prominent pundit Bayo Onanuga criticized Peter Obi in an interview on Channels Television’s Mic on Podcast, claiming that the government was the target of a planned campaign of hostility. Onanuga drew attention to what he saw as a pattern in Obi’s conduct, implying a selective style of commentary that mostly targets criticism of government acts while neglecting encouraging advancements. CONTINUE FULL READING>>>>>
“When government has done something good, he (Peter Obi) will never comment about it but when it is bad news, quickly he will tweet. So, you can see a deliberate attempt to denigrate this government, to paint it black all the time,” Onanuga asserted during the interview.
Onanuga’s remarks emphasized his perception of Obi’s actions as a calculated effort to tarnish the government’s reputation consistently. He pointed to the discrepancy in Obi’s responses to government initiatives, alleging a partisan agenda that prioritizes criticism over constructive engagement.
The accusation resonated widely, reigniting debates on the role of political commentary in shaping public perception. Onanuga’s assessment of Obi’s behavior prompted reflection on the responsibilities of public figures in providing balanced and objective assessments of governance.
Leave a Reply