Moro explained that his role as Minority Leader requires him to ensure peace and order among senators, regardless of their political affiliations. When the disagreement erupted, he immediately approached the Senate President to calm tensions. Akpabio, however, stood firm on his decision, citing Senate rules that grant him the authority to arrange seating arrangements. Moro, recognizing the Senate President’s stance, decided to intervene by appealing to Natasha to comply temporarily, hoping the issue could be resolved later.
To his surprise, Natasha refused to budge. According to Moro, she told him to go back to whoever sent him and deliver the message that she would not leave her seat. Her unwavering stance left Moro in a difficult position, as his efforts to mediate had failed. Feeling frustrated, he returned to his seat, acknowledging that he had done all he could to resolve the matter peacefully.
The incident highlights the tensions that can arise in the Senate, even over seemingly minor issues like seating arrangements. Moro’s account paints a picture of a delicate balancing act, where maintaining order often requires navigating strong personalities and conflicting interests. While the situation remains unresolved, it serves as a reminder of the challenges faced by leaders in managing disputes within legislative bodies.CONTINUE FULL READING>>>>>
